Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Canadian Health care: Not good enough for Parliament Member (Read the Comments Section for the People's Assesment of Socialized Medicine in Canada)

Canadian Parliament Memberess, Belinda Stronach, has traveled to the U.S. for cancer treatment. Her doctor in Canada recommended that she go to the States because "the U.S. hospital was the best place to have it done due to the type of surgery required."

As I researched Parliament Memberess Beliinda Stronach, I uncovered a lot of dirt, all public information, such as:

1) She is an heiress to millions. That's not real dirt, but worth mentioning because she is a Liberal

2) She was on the board of Directors for 5 automotive parts companies. You know, they provide parts for cars which are killing our planet.

Now for the good stuff!

3) In January, 2004, Larry Zolf of CBC news reported that Stronach admitted that she used marijuana.

Not surprised as she is a good "friend" of former U.S. President, Bill, I didn't inhale" Clinton. Oh yeah, I almost forgot, womanizer. Wink, Wink.

4) She is twice divorced

5) She was the "other woman" in 2 extramarital affairs she had with a couple of ex-NHL players. And dated several other men in a year or two and said this to defend her actions: "Let's face it. I don't sit at home and knit on Friday nights."

6) She is pro abortion

7) She is pro gun control

8) She is pro gay marriage


I am not in the habit of trashing members of another nations government, but in this case, it is warranted and here is why as it may apply to the U.S. government on health care.

American Liberals tout socialized health care as being more important than economic and political freedom. Canada's health care system is commonly used as an example. But if Canada's system was so damn good, why did a member of their government, come to the U.S. for treatment? Liberals also praise Fidel Castro because he provides socialized health care, yet recently, when Fidel Castor became ill, he had a doctor fly in from Spain!

On Monday, Spanish authorities confirmed that Garcia Sabrido had traveled to Cuba's capital with advanced medical equipment for Castro and to study a possible surgery. The Madrid's health department has been sending medicines to Cuba since June.

Dr. Sabrido has had some training in the U.S., courtesy of privatized medicine. Ironic, isn't it?
Spanish Health care

So now, we have a fanatical supporter of socialized medicine, coming to the U.S. at the behest of her socialized doctor, for treatment in a privatized health system, because "it is better". We have a Communist Dictator requesting a doctor from a nation that is welcoming privatized health care. We have people from third world cesspools and other socialist nations coming to the U.S. to become doctors only to go back to their native countries. Are you seeing the pattern here?

Countries with a long history of socialized medicine are beginning to privatize. The quality of privatized health care in the considered impeccable by the world. And like it or not, the United States does have socialized health care already! It's called county hospitals! It's called Social Security! It's called Medicare/Medicaid! And my proof is that 1.5 trillion tax payer dollars are used to fund it!

One last thing. Socialized health care is nowhere to be found in the Constitution. It is not in the Bill of Right's. As a matter of fact, it is found nowhere in any founding document anywhere! So these Liberal "humanists" need to get this through their heads: NOBODY HAS A "RIGHT" TO SOCIALIZED MEDICINE!

Once again, our votes are meaningless
I say votes because in the past six years the voters of CA have voted against gay marriage, not one, but three times in general elections. Do our votes not matter at all anymore?

Apparently not. As this week the CA Senate has once again ignored the voice of the people and has passed AB43.

A previous post demonstrates how those in a domestic partnerships can and do have the same "rights" as those in a marriage between a man and a woman, the objective of the gay community is not seeking equality...they seek special acknowledgements, entitlements and superiortity in all aspects of life, as we see with their continued battle over the military's "Don't ask, don't tell" policy. Instead of being grateful that the military considers one's sexual preference as "none of their business"...the gay community wants to force them to not only recognize sexual preferences, but then give preferential treatment to certain groups because of it!

Little by little, we are losing more and more of any resemblance to a moralistic society. Those of us who simply want to live our lives freely, without extensive government involvement and intrusion; without having the majority of our paychecks taken to support non-essential government programs (i.e, the welfare state), and without government interference in the daily practice of our faith and beliefs, are ridiculed. We continue to have our voices ignored, even when they are in the majority, as in the case of gay marriage and California. We appear to no longer be a nation in which government is ruled by the people, for the people!

Instead, we have become a nation in which those in "power" have manipulated the system, taken advantage of the people and rule without regard to the laws in which our great nation was founded.

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

First Amendment 101, for the Constitutionally illiterate.

Amendment I to the Constitution of the Unites States.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Note the very first word in this very first Amendment. Congress.

Congress, definition of from

1. (initial capital letter) a. the national legislative body of the U.S., consisting of the Senate, or upper house, and the House of Representatives, or lower house, as a continuous institution.
b. this body as it exists for a period of two years during which it has the same membership: the 96th Congress.
c. a session of this body: to speak in Congress.

2. the national legislative body of a nation, esp. of a republic.
3. a formal meeting or assembly of representatives for the discussion, arrangement, or promotion of some matter of common interest.
4. the act of coming together; an encounter; meeting.
5. an association, esp. one composed of representatives of various organizations.
6. familiar relations; dealings; intercourse.
7. coitus; sexual intercourse.
–verb (used without object) 8. to assemble together; meet in congress.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech

The First Amendment to the Constitution, says that Congress shall pass no law prohibiting free speech.

Now, I am not the government. I have not sought nor have I been elected to any body of government. I am not a member of Congress. I cannot pass a law of any kind. Therefore, the First Amendment does not regulate me. It regulates the government.

The last time that I checked, Fox News was not a member of the government. So when they chose, as free citizens of America, to turn off Sally Fields microphone, they have not violated ANY LAW in the United States of America.

This is where the hypocrisy and blatant ignorance of Liberals shines through brightly. I cannot state obvious facts, such as:
Blacks have the highest abortion rate in the nation.
If I were to say that, which is factually true, I would be branded a racist by most Liberals, and in today's world, who wants to be branded a racist? One can even get fired for exercising their "free speech" in that regard.

On most Liberal blogs that I have tried to have debates on, I am censored constantly by them. They constantly ban me from their sites. So much for "free speech", huh? They can call me: Hitler, Fascist, Nazi, Hillbilly, Redneck (even though I live near Chicago) but I cannot call an illegal alien, an illegal alien, without being branded a racist. They must be called "Undocumented Worker" because that highlights their "humanity", in an attempt to lessen the fact that they have deliberately violated our laws.

A few more examples: Former presidential candidate Pat Buchanan was hit with salad dressing during a speech, while right-wing pundit Ann Coulter, Weekly Standard editor William Kristol, and right-wing commentator David Horowitz all had pies thrown at them by so-called, tolerant, "free speech" loving Liberals while speaking at Universities.

Some random comments from Liberals taken from blogs or comments sections from articles:

Fox, like the administration, think that censorship and repetition of lies will keep us at war. Fox is sleaze TV, has been since the beginning, yet anti-war free speech must be censored from our delicate ears. Profits and power above humanity allows them to sleep well at night. Sleep tight.

As for saying goddamn? Who cares? It wasn't f*** or something major like that. I'm sorry if some of the more radical Christians are so offended, but they are not the only people in this country.

Freedom of speech, look into it.

This is _supposed_ to be a free country with a First Amendment to the Constitution. Field has a right to say whatever she damn well pleases.

It is truly amazing how many people confuse religion with politics... have your religious beliefs but don't push it onto everyone else. We are a nation that used to believe in the freedom of religion and speech. If I want to say "GOD DAMN", I will and so will Sally. Get over it. If you just can't, why don't you win your self rightious butt an Emmy and tell us all how much you love the war and hate people who say god damn, I bet you won't be censored.

Sally’s Comment should not have been censored by Fox, since it was just an opinion, that should have been allowed by our Constituitional right to free speech. Where is the democracy here Fox? Fox-do American’s still have the right to Free Speech and opinions?

The issue was her politics, which were in the face of the politics of all News Corp and Murchdoch holdings. Pretty sad shot at the already dying First Amendment.

Here is the simple difference. Fox News is not the Government! Fox can cut the mic from anyone they want to! If we are in fact, losing our First Amendment rights, which applies mostly to Conservatives rather than Liberals, it is because Liberals lack of respect and decency have forced some sort of mediation(government). I have always said: If society does not regulate itself, then the government will, and that is exactly why Liberals pull this offensive nonsense.(Current Communist Goals, #'s 24 &25 ) The more reckless our society becomes, the more the government will step in, and that is exactly what the Liberals want, as long as it is a Liberal government.

Thursday, September 13, 2007

Communist Goals (1963)
Documention below


Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35
January 10, 1963

Current Communist Goals



Thursday, January 10, 1963

Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.

At Mrs. Nordman's request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following "Current Communist Goals," which she identifies as an excerpt from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen:

[From "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen]


1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.

6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.

9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.

10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a "religious crutch."

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.

43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.

45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.

Human Rights Hypocrisy

In January 2007, masked men grabbed a 5 year old Iraqi boy named Youssif, doused him with gasoline, and burned him alive.

On September 11, 2007, he and his family arrived in the United States for plastic surgery.

Now, I hate to bring politics into a situation such as this, but I feel that it is needed. Liberal Democrats claim a monopoly on championing human rights protections. Why then, are they turning their backs on people, and not limited to, little Youssif? How many mass graves have been unearthed in Iraq? How many horror stories have been documented showing the cruelty of Saddam Hussein? And I am not talking about making people wear panties on their heads, I am talking about real and true torture, such as cutting off people's hands, having a car roll over a child's arm to earn money, or tying a man to a pole and beat him while his neighbors are forced to watch.


Saddam Torture Video
Saddam Torture Video
Saddam Torture Video
Saddam Torture Video

Yet, Liberal Democrats want the US to leave the Middle East and allow these atrocities to continue, knowing full well of their existence. They say that they are against our soldiers dying in Iraq, but have no problems with our soldiers dying in Darfur. They say that the reason we are in the Middle East, is because they have oil over there. I say we are in the Middle East, because they brought terrorism over here.

Democrats need to realize, that the rest of the world does not live like we do, or, other nations that we have either liberated, or aided in their liberation. Japan brainwashed their citizens in WW II and slaughtered innocent Chinese in their conquest. War ended that. Germany executed 6 million Jews and countless others in their conquest of Europe. War ended that. After the ceasefire in Korea, South Korea was freed and flourished, while Communist North Korea suffered in poverty and dictatorship. War, led by a God fearing Republican, freed African slaves in the US.

Read the article about little Youssif and his family. Note their reaction to being in the United States:

"I feel like I'm in a dream,"

"You see America on television, but you never imagine or dream that you will ever be here." He paused, tears in his eyes.
"It's more than paradise."

To Liberals and to Democrats, this means nothing. To them, the only thing that matters, is that President Bush fails. The only thing that matters to them, is that their socialist agenda gets pushed through. The only thing more important to them, than atrocities in foreign lands, is that 1.2 million teenagers in the US, get a two dollar an hour raise in a minimum wage job while they go to school on tax payer funding, because that, will no doubt, cure the evils of the world.

Blog Archive

BTTS - Where Personal Responsibilty is the EXPECTED NORM!